From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:11:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:11:12 -0400 Received: from 2-225.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.160.225]:5267 "EHLO 2-225.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:11:11 -0400 Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 19:16:32 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Larry McVoy cc: Miquel van Smoorenburg , Subject: Re: New BK License Problem? In-Reply-To: <20021006150554.T29486@work.bitmover.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Larry McVoy wrote: > If you could have figured out a way to do the same amount of good that > we are providing but in a more politically correct (i.e. GPLed) way, > then why the hell haven't you? Because ... Whining Is Easy (tm) I'm running into this all the time, with discussions that go like: Me: "It's hard to build a VM that does the right thing in every situation" Somebody: "So why don't you build a separate desktop and server VM?" Me: "Umm, what would those two need to do differently ? What functional difference would there be ?" Somebody: "Dunno, I don't care, why don't you just do it and figure out the details later?" These discussions tend to go downhill from there... cheers, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org