From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 10:28:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 10:28:12 -0400 Received: from 2-136.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.160.136]:10975 "EHLO 2-136.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 10:28:11 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 12:33:54 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Rob Landley cc: Xavier Bestel , Robert Love , Ben Collins , Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new In-Reply-To: <200210201926.19757.landley@trommello.org> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Rob Landley wrote: > On Sunday 20 October 2002 17:53, Rik van Riel wrote: > > Germany (and France, judging from your words) have laws that > > guarantee that the creator of a work keeps copyright on the > > work. At least, part of the copyright cannot be signed over > > to other people or organisations. > 3) The creator of a work doesn't always get the copyright, at least in > the US. Please see above. It's possible the FSF copyright assignment just can't be legal in some countries. Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: october@surriel.com