From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964794AbVI0OVU (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:21:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964804AbVI0OVT (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:21:19 -0400 Received: from iolanthe.rowland.org ([192.131.102.54]:27064 "HELO iolanthe.rowland.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S964795AbVI0OVT (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:21:19 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:21:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@iolanthe.rowland.org To: Atsushi Nemoto cc: jim.ramsay@gmail.com, , , , Subject: Re: [Linux-usb-users] Possible bug in usb storage (2.6.11 kernel) In-Reply-To: <20050927.223801.130240000.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 8 Sep 2005 16:40:16 -0400 (EDT), Alan Stern said: > > stern> I've long thought that usb-storage should allocate its own > stern> transfer buffer for sense data. In the past people have said, > stern> "No, don't bother, it's not really needed." Here's a good > stern> reason for doing it. > > stern> Expect a patch before long. > > Did you already create the patch? If not, how about this (against 2.6.13) ? Yes I did. You can see it at https://lists.one-eyed-alien.net/pipermail/usb-storage/2005-September/001953.html Alan Stern