From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Cc: balbi@ti.com, <tony@atomide.com>, <ruslan.bilovol@ti.com>,
<linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] USB: ehci-omap: Suspend the controller during bus suspend
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:40:28 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1306271032210.1167-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51CAEEC4.4030304@ti.com>
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > Could the mapping be changed so that a different interrupt vector was
> > used for wakeups and normal I/O? That would make this a little easier,
> > although it wouldn't solve the general problem.
>
> I'm not sure which IRQ we can map it to, but it could be mapped to some
> free IRQ number. Since it doesn't make things easier, I think we can leave
> it as it is for now.
All right.
> > There's still a race problem. Suppose a normal wakeup interrupt occurs
> > just before or as the controller gets suspended. By the time the code
> > here runs, HCD_HW_ACCESSIBLE may have been cleared by the suspend
> > routine. The interrupt would be lost. Depending on the design of the
> > controller, the entire wakeup signal could end up getting lost as well.
>
> But if I call ehci_suspend() in the runtime_suspend handler, this race
> won't happen right?
That race doesn't apply to your system anyway; it matters only on
systems where hcd->has_wakeup_irq isn't set. The only way to fix it
involves changing ehci_suspend() somewhat (and making the equivalent
change for other HCDs too). Those musings above were just me thinking
out loud about the problems involved in implementing reliable wakeups.
> > Do you know how the OMAP EHCI controller behaves? Under what
> > conditions does it send the wakeup IRQ? How do you tell it to turn off
> > the wakeup IRQ?
>
> Once the controller is suspended, the wakeup IRQ comes out-of-band. i.e. through
> pad wakeup and pinctrl subsystem.
> The only way to turn that wakeup off is to disable the wakeup enable bit on the pad.
> This could be done by not putting the pins in the IDLE_WAKEUP state during
> suspend.
That's not what I meant. Never mind the pinctrl; I was asking about
the EHCI controller itself. Under what circumstances does the
controller assert its wakeup signal? And how do you tell it to stop
asserting that signal?
> Thanks for the review.
>
> I updated the ehci-omap.c driver to call ehci_suspend/resume during runtime_suspend/resume.
> After that, it stopped detecting the port status change event when a device was plugged
> to an external HUB. The wakeup irq was coming and the root hub/controller were being resumed,
> but after that, no hub_irq.
Wait a minute. I'm not clear on what happened. You're starting out
with the controller, the root hub, and the external hub all suspended,
right? Then you plugged a new device into the external hub. This
caused the controller and the root hub to wake up, but not the external
hub?
> Adding some delay (or printk) somewhere in the resume path fixes the issue. I'm not sure what
> is going on and why the delay is needed. Below is the ehci-omap patch. I've put the delay
> in the runtime_resume handler.
>
> e.g. log
>
> [ 8.674377] usb usb1: usb wakeup-resume
> [ 8.678833] ehci-omap 48064800.ehci: omap_ehci_runtime_resume
> [ 8.695190] usb usb1: usb auto-resume
> [ 8.699066] ehci-omap 48064800.ehci: resume root hub
> [ 8.704437] hub 1-0:1.0: hub_resume
> [ 8.708312] hub 1-0:1.0: port 2: status 0507 change 0000
> [ 8.714630] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 3 chg 0000 evt 0000
>
> <---- gets stuck here in the failing case---->
>
> [ 8.723541] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 3 chg 0000 evt 0004
> [ 8.729400] ehci-omap 48064800.ehci: GetStatus port:2 status 001005 0 ACK POWER sig=se0 PE CONNECT
> [ 8.753204] usb 1-2: usb wakeup-resume
> [ 8.757293] usb 1-2: finish resume
> [ 8.761627] hub 1-2:1.0: hub_resume
Yeah, we need more debugging info. In ehci_irq(), right after the
"pstatus = ehci_readl(..." line, what is the value of pstatus? And in
the GetPortStatus case of ehci_hub_control(), right after the "temp =
ehci_readl(..." line, what is the value of temp?
> @@ -286,15 +293,70 @@ static const struct of_device_id omap_ehci_dt_ids[] = {
>
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, omap_ehci_dt_ids);
>
> +static int omap_ehci_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + bool do_wakeup = device_may_wakeup(dev);
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "%s: do_wakeup: %d\n", __func__, do_wakeup);
> +
> + return ehci_suspend(hcd, do_wakeup);
> +}
> +
> +static int omap_ehci_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "%s\n", __func__);
> +
> + return ehci_resume(hcd, false);
> +}
Those two routines look okay.
> +static int omap_ehci_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct omap_hcd *omap = (struct omap_hcd *)hcd_to_ehci(hcd)->priv;
> + bool do_wakeup = device_may_wakeup(dev);
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "%s\n", __func__);
> +
> + if (omap->initialized)
> + ehci_suspend(hcd, do_wakeup);
Here you should not use do_wakeup. The second argument should always
be "true", because wakeup is always enabled during runtime suspend.
Also, why do you need omap->initialized? Do you think you might get a
wakeup interrupt before the controller has been fully set up? I don't
see how you could, given the pm_runtime_get_sync() call in the probe
routine.
Alan Stern
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-27 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-19 14:05 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Suspend USB Host controller on bus suspend Roger Quadros
2013-06-19 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] mfd: omap-usb-host: move initialization to module_init() Roger Quadros
2013-06-20 12:07 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-20 12:29 ` Roger Quadros
2013-06-19 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] mfd: omap-usb-host: Put pins in IDLE state on suspend Roger Quadros
2013-06-19 17:23 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-06-20 7:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-06-20 12:30 ` Roger Quadros
2013-06-19 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] USB: ehci: allow controller drivers to override irq & bus_suspend/resume Roger Quadros
2013-06-19 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] USB: ehci-omap: Suspend the controller during bus suspend Roger Quadros
2013-06-19 17:39 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-06-20 12:32 ` Roger Quadros
2013-06-20 12:11 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-20 12:35 ` Roger Quadros
2013-06-20 17:33 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-24 15:09 ` Roger Quadros
2013-06-24 19:34 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-25 13:59 ` Roger Quadros
2013-06-25 17:38 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-26 13:38 ` Roger Quadros
2013-06-27 15:40 ` Alan Stern [this message]
2013-06-28 12:20 ` Roger Quadros
2013-06-28 13:57 ` Roger Quadros
2013-06-28 19:18 ` Alan Stern
2013-07-01 8:33 ` Roger Quadros
2013-06-28 19:06 ` Alan Stern
2013-07-01 8:16 ` Roger Quadros
2013-07-01 16:24 ` Alan Stern
2013-07-01 16:49 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-01 21:01 ` Alan Stern
2013-07-02 8:22 ` Roger Quadros
2013-07-02 17:17 ` Alan Stern
2013-07-03 9:13 ` Roger Quadros
2013-07-03 12:57 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-03 13:06 ` Roger Quadros
2013-07-03 13:15 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-03 14:30 ` Alan Stern
2013-07-09 13:58 ` Roger Quadros
2013-06-19 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] ARM: dts: omap3beagle-xm: Add idle state pins for USB host Roger Quadros
2013-06-19 18:42 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-06-20 11:55 ` Roger Quadros
2013-06-20 12:02 ` Roger Quadros
2013-06-20 13:02 ` Roger Quadros
2013-06-19 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] ARM: OMAP3: Enable Hardware Save and Restore for USB Host Roger Quadros
2013-06-19 17:30 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-20 12:42 ` Roger Quadros
2013-06-19 15:23 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] Suspend USB Host controller on bus suspend Alan Stern
2013-06-20 12:39 ` Roger Quadros
2013-06-20 17:19 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1306271032210.1167-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org \
--to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rogerq@ti.com \
--cc=ruslan.bilovol@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).