From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] PM: Enable option of re-use runtime PM callbacks at system suspend
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 17:21:50 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1312051720330.869-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJvTdKnqD3ccPUzh7kNMNqrEYFfD93Vh9hgFuKyHz+pjGNHdtA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013, Len Brown wrote:
> This thread raises the question...
>
> Do we still need to have PM_RUNTIME apart from PM_SLEEP?
>
> What is the benefit of being able to build-in one one without the other?
> If that benefit is not significant, perhaps the time has come to
> replace them both with CONFIG_PM...
There are lots of embedded/SoC platforms that implement PM_RUNTIME but
not PM_SLEEP.
Alan Stern
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-05 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-27 15:34 [PATCH 0/5] PM: Enable option of re-use runtime PM callbacks at system suspend Ulf Hansson
2013-11-27 15:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] PM / Sleep: Add pm_generic functions to re-use runtime PM callbacks Ulf Hansson
2013-12-03 23:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-03 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-04 11:00 ` Ulf Hansson
2013-11-27 15:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] PM / Runtime: Implement the pm_generic_runtime functions for CONFIG_PM Ulf Hansson
2013-11-27 15:34 ` [PATCH 3/5] PM / Runtime: Add second macro for definition of runtime PM callbacks Ulf Hansson
2013-11-27 15:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] PM / Sleep: Add macro to define common late/early system " Ulf Hansson
2013-11-27 15:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/exynos: Convert to suspend_late/resume_early callbacks for fimc Ulf Hansson
2013-11-27 20:42 ` [PATCH 0/5] PM: Enable option of re-use runtime PM callbacks at system suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-28 9:58 ` Ulf Hansson
2013-11-28 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-29 9:32 ` Ulf Hansson
2013-11-29 9:35 ` Ulf Hansson
2013-11-29 13:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-29 14:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-29 15:30 ` Alan Stern
2013-11-29 21:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-02 15:50 ` Ulf Hansson
2013-12-05 21:46 ` Len Brown
2013-12-05 22:21 ` Alan Stern [this message]
2013-12-06 0:53 ` Pavel Machek
2013-12-02 15:21 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1312051720330.869-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org \
--to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).