linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] PM / sleep: Mechanism to avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices unnecessarily
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 10:29:42 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1405151024060.1415-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140515060924.69ae7486@ultegra>

On Thu, 15 May 2014, Jacob Pan wrote:

> > > should we respect ignore_children flag here? not all parent devices
> > > create children with proper .prepare() function. this allows parents
> > > override children.
> > > I am looking at USB, a USB device could have logical children such
> > > as ep_xx, they don't go through the same subsystem .prepare().
> > 
> > Well, I'm not sure about that.  Let me consider that for a while.
> OK. let me be more clear about the situation i see in USB. Correct me
> if I am wrong, a USB device will always has at least one endpoint/ep_00
> as a kid for control pipe, it is a logical device. So when
> device_prepare() is called, its call back is NULL which
> makes .direct_complete = 0. Since children device suspend is called
> before parents, the parents .direct_complete flag will always get
> cleared.
> 
> What i am trying to achieve here is to see if we avoid resuming
> built-in (hardwired connect_type) non-hub USB devices based on this new
> patchset. E.g. we don't want to resume/suspend USB camera every time in
> system suspend/resume cycle if they are already rpm suspended. We can
> save ~100ms resume time for the devices we have tested.

This is a good point, but I don't think it is at all related to 
ignore_children.

Instead, it seems that the best way to solve it would be to add a 
->prepare() handler for usb_ep_device_type that would always turn 
on direct_complete.

Alan Stern


  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-15 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-13  1:02 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] PM / sleep: Avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices during system suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13  1:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] PM / sleep: Move runtime PM barrier invocation to device_prepare() Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13  9:16   ` Ulf Hansson
2014-05-13 10:35     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13 10:59       ` Ulf Hansson
2014-05-13 15:07         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13 15:19           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13  1:10 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] PM / sleep: Mechanism to avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices unnecessarily Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13  9:30   ` Ulf Hansson
2014-05-13 14:49   ` Alan Stern
2014-05-13 15:13     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13 15:12       ` Alan Stern
2014-05-13 15:43         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13 15:46           ` Alan Stern
2014-05-13 16:16             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13 16:19               ` Alan Stern
2014-05-13 21:29                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-14 14:53                   ` Alan Stern
2014-05-15 11:13                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-16  0:45                       ` [PATCH 0/3] (was: Re: PM / sleep: Mechanism to avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices unnecessarily) Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-16  0:46                         ` [PATCH 1/3] PM / sleep: Mechanism to avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices unnecessarily Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-16 14:27                           ` Alan Stern
2014-05-16 21:10                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-16  0:47                         ` [PATCH 2/3] PM / sleep: Update device PM documentation to cover direct_complete Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-16  0:48                         ` [PATCH 3/3][Resend] ACPI / PM: Avoid resuming devices in ACPI PM domain during system suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-16 22:18                           ` [PATCH 3/3][update] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-15 12:06                     ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] PM / sleep: Mechanism to avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices unnecessarily Ulf Hansson
2014-05-15 12:55                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-15 17:35             ` Kevin Hilman
2014-05-14 22:24   ` Jacob Pan
2014-05-15 11:11     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-15 13:09       ` Jacob Pan
2014-05-15 14:29         ` Alan Stern [this message]
2014-05-15  7:03           ` Jacob Pan
2014-05-15 15:58             ` Alan Stern
2014-05-16 15:20               ` Jacob Pan
2014-05-16 21:08                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-19  9:18                   ` Jacob Pan
2014-05-19 19:53                     ` Alan Stern
2014-05-19 20:13                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-19 20:20                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13  1:10 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] ACPI / PM: Avoid resuming devices in ACPI PM domain during system suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13 14:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] PM / sleep: Avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices " Alan Stern
2014-05-13 15:25   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13 15:25     ` Alan Stern
2014-05-13 15:46       ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1405151024060.1415-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org \
    --to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=khilman@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).