Re: [PATCH v9 4/5] usb: ehci: Add new EHCI driver for Broadcom STB SoC's

[Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>]

On Mon, 11 May 2020, Al Cooper wrote:

> Add a new EHCI driver for Broadcom STB SoC's. A new EHCI driver
> was created instead of adding support to the existing ehci platform
> driver because of the code required to work around bugs in the EHCI
> controller. The primary workaround is for a bug where the Core
> violates the SOF interval between the first two SOFs transmitted after
> resume. This only happens if the resume occurs near the end of a
> microframe. The fix is to intercept the ehci-hcd request to complete
> RESUME and align it to the start of the next microframe.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Al Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---

I hate to point this out...

> +static int ehci_brcm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct resource *res_mem;
> +	struct brcm_priv *priv;
> +	struct usb_hcd *hcd;
> +	int irq;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> +	if (irq <= 0)
> +		return irq ? irq : EINVAL;

That should be -EINVAL.

To tell the truth, I'm not sure it's worthwhile checking for irq == 0.  
That's up to Greg to decide.

Anyway, as far as I'm concerned you can either change EINVAL to -EINVAL
or change the whole thing back to "if (irq < 0) return irq;".  Either
way, you may add:

Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>

Alan Stern