linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* 2.5.69, aar_rx_intr, irq 30: nobody cared!
@ 2003-05-06  9:33 Tommy Wu
  2003-05-06 10:35 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tommy Wu @ 2003-05-06  9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

May  6 13:15:37 test kernel: handlers:
May  6 13:15:37 test kernel: [aac_rx_intr+0/212]
May  6 13:15:37 test kernel: irq 30: nobody cared!
May  6 13:15:37 test kernel: Call Trace: [handle_IRQ_event+147/232]  [do_IRQ+194/304]
  [  common_interrupt+24/32]  [try_to_unmap_one+275/368]  [bio_put+24/48]  
  [end_bio_bh_io_sync+33/48]  [bio_endio+70/76]  [__end_that_request_first+256/464] 
  [end_that_request_first+23/28]  [scsi_end_request+36/160]  [scsi_io_completion+561/1100]
  [sd_rw_intr+470/480]  [scsi_finish_command+208/216]  [scsi_softirq+490/516]  
  [do_softirq+106/200]  [do_IRQ+288/304]  [default_idle+0/52]  [rest_init+0/72]  
  [common_interrupt+24/32]  [default_idle+0/52]  [rest_init+0/72]  [default_idle+41/52]  
  [cpu_idle+55/72]  [rest_init+69/72]  [start_kernel+379/384]

-- 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.5.69, aar_rx_intr, irq 30: nobody cared!
  2003-05-06  9:33 2.5.69, aar_rx_intr, irq 30: nobody cared! Tommy Wu
@ 2003-05-06 10:35 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Zwane Mwaikambo @ 2003-05-06 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tommy Wu; +Cc: Linux Kernel

On Tue, 6 May 2003, Tommy Wu wrote:

> May  6 13:15:37 test kernel: handlers:
> May  6 13:15:37 test kernel: [aac_rx_intr+0/212]
> May  6 13:15:37 test kernel: irq 30: nobody cared!
> May  6 13:15:37 test kernel: Call Trace: [handle_IRQ_event+147/232]  [do_IRQ+194/304]
>   [  common_interrupt+24/32]  [try_to_unmap_one+275/368]  [bio_put+24/48]  
>   [end_bio_bh_io_sync+33/48]  [bio_endio+70/76]  [__end_that_request_first+256/464] 
>   [end_that_request_first+23/28]  [scsi_end_request+36/160]  [scsi_io_completion+561/1100]
>   [sd_rw_intr+470/480]  [scsi_finish_command+208/216]  [scsi_softirq+490/516]  
>   [do_softirq+106/200]  [do_IRQ+288/304]  [default_idle+0/52]  [rest_init+0/72]  
>   [common_interrupt+24/32]  [default_idle+0/52]  [rest_init+0/72]  [default_idle+41/52]  
>   [cpu_idle+55/72]  [rest_init+69/72]  [start_kernel+379/384]

How spurious are these? I just looked at the OIMR programming and i can't 
see how this managed to slip by, perhaps someone really doesn't honour 
their interrupt disable bit.

-- 
function.linuxpower.ca

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-06 10:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-06  9:33 2.5.69, aar_rx_intr, irq 30: nobody cared! Tommy Wu
2003-05-06 10:35 ` Zwane Mwaikambo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).