From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270934AbTGVRXf (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:23:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270936AbTGVRXf (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:23:35 -0400 Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([208.129.208.51]:43433 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270934AbTGVRXd (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:23:33 -0400 X-AuthUser: davidel@xmailserver.org Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:31:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.com To: Jamie Lokier cc: "Randy.Dunlap" , lkml Subject: Re: asm (lidt) question In-Reply-To: <20030722172722.GC3267@mail.jlokier.co.uk> Message-ID: References: <20030717152819.66cfdbaf.rddunlap@osdl.org> <20030722172722.GC3267@mail.jlokier.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > IMHO, since "var" is really an output parameter. > > "var" is read, not written. > I think you are confusing "lidt" with "sidt". Actually I don't even know what I was confusing, since L and S are not there for nothing ;) And yes, the form with =m as input parameter should be corrected, even if it generates the same code. - Davide