From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270712AbTGNTQ2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:16:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270719AbTGNTQ1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:16:27 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:32398 "EHLO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270712AbTGNTQ0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:16:26 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:28:49 -0300 (BRT) From: Marcelo Tosatti X-X-Sender: marcelo@freak.distro.conectiva To: Alan Cox Cc: lkml Subject: Re: PATCH: sim710 resend #5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <200307141224.h6ECOrQj030905@hraefn.swansea.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > And it doenst apply: > > marcelo@freak linux-2.4.22-pre5]$ patch -p1 < /tmp/sim > patching file drivers/scsi/sim710_d.h > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] > Apply anyway? [n] > Skipping patch. > 9 out of 9 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file > drivers/scsi/sim710_d.h.rej > > that linux-2.4.22-pre5 tree has been generated out of local BK tree. > > Now if I apply your patch against a 2.4.22-pre5 from tarballs and patches > it works fine. Weird. > > I'll investigate it later. My diff script had sim710_d.h in its ignore list, eek.