From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262123AbTI0SCL (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2003 14:02:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262126AbTI0SCL (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2003 14:02:11 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:65480 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262123AbTI0SCL (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2003 14:02:11 -0400 Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 20:02:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Ingo Molnar Reply-To: Ingo Molnar To: Gabor MICSKO Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Test] exec-shield-2.6.0-test5-G2 vs. paxtest & libsafe In-Reply-To: <1064678738.3578.8.camel@sunshine> Message-ID: References: <1064678738.3578.8.camel@sunshine> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Gabor MICSKO wrote: > Kernel: > Linux sunshine 2.6.0-test5-exec-shield-nptl #3 SMP 2003. sze. 27., > szombat, 13.37.42 CEST i686 GNU/Linux thanks for the testing. The ELF loader changes had a bug which ended up in creating an extra executable page after .bss, failing some of the tests. I've fixed this, could you try the -G3 patch?: redhat.com/~mingo/exec-shield/exec-shield-2.6.0-test5-G3 redhat.com/~mingo/exec-shield/exec-shield-2.6.0-test5-bk12-G3 Ingo