From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263772AbTLJRaQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:30:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263777AbTLJRaQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:30:16 -0500 Received: from hibernia.jakma.org ([213.79.33.168]:16023 "EHLO hibernia.jakma.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263772AbTLJRaM (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:30:12 -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:30:01 +0000 (GMT) From: Paul Jakma X-X-Sender: paul@fogarty.jakma.org To: Jens Axboe cc: Joe Thornber , Marcelo Tosatti , Linux Mailing List Subject: Re: Device-mapper submission for 2.4 In-Reply-To: <20031210084546.GG3988@suse.de> Message-ID: References: <20031209134551.GG472@reti> <20031209143412.GI472@reti> <20031209222624.GA6591@reti> <20031210084546.GG3988@suse.de> X-NSA: iraq saddam hammas hisballah rabin ayatollah korea vietnam revolt mustard gas MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Jens Axboe wrote: > Arguments akin to "But XFS got merged, surely we can to" don't hold > up one bit. Should be obvious why. Its not about a /new/ feature, its about an existing feature which is incompatible between 2.4 and 2.6. I dont really care whether its done via forward or backware compat. (but why was LVM1 removed from 2.6?) regards, -- Paul Jakma paul@clubi.ie paul@jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A warning: do not ever send email to spam@dishone.st Fortune: [Washington, D.C.] is the home of... taste for the people -- the big, the bland and the banal. -- Ada Louise Huxtable