From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263898AbTLEHN4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2003 02:13:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263902AbTLEHN4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2003 02:13:56 -0500 Received: from ahriman.bucharest.roedu.net ([141.85.128.71]:6019 "EHLO ahriman.bucharest.roedu.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263898AbTLEHNy (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2003 02:13:54 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 09:14:04 +0200 (EET) From: Mihai RUSU X-X-Sender: dizzy@ahriman.bucharest.roedu.net To: Nathan Scott cc: Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List , Jens Axboe , Neil Brown Subject: Re: kernel BUG at mm/filemap.c:332! In-Reply-To: <20031204211611.GA567@frodo> Message-ID: References: <20031204211611.GA567@frodo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Nathan Scott wrote: > Was your filesystem near full? There was a 2.4 deadlock fixed > recently which could be what you hit there. No it wasnt. It has a ~50% usage. > You'll want a more recent 2.4 XFS kernel I suspect - Steve made > several improvements in this area awhile back. Ok. I know about improvements since XFS 1.1 and I assumed that using a recent (ie 2.6.0-test11) kernel the XFS bits with it whould be recent and such have those improvements. > OK, looks like a default mkfs then (with an old-ish mkfs binary)? True. Its a general /var partition, there waasnt any interest in giving mkfs paramteres for it. > Newer mkfs' will give you a better AG layout and unwritten extents > would be turned on - not relevent to this problem at all though. Ok, noted :) > An "ls -ld" and "xfs_bmap -v" on the directory would also provide > me a bit more info to work with -- thanks! $ ls -ld interfaces/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 16384 Dec 5 09:06 interfaces/ $ /usr/sbin/xfs_bmap interfaces/ interfaces/: 0: [0..7]: 25238288..25238295 1: [8..31]: 25238304..25238327 > I have a few ideas about what this might be, let me stew on those > for a bit and try a few things. Thanks! > -- > Nathan - -- Mihai RUSU Email: dizzy@roedu.net GPG : http://dizzy.roedu.net/dizzy-gpg.txt WWW: http://dizzy.roedu.net "Linux is obsolete" -- AST -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/0DA+PZzOzrZY/1QRAnRoAJ9/VKw3okVloX1gTdayWXf1zxeJqACg1h9S P9hQSHgK/K1CmlgT9/2L+H8= =8PPr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----