From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263531AbTLJAAz (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:00:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263537AbTLJAAz (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:00:55 -0500 Received: from modemcable067.88-70-69.mc.videotron.ca ([69.70.88.67]:36480 "EHLO montezuma.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263531AbTLJAAx (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:00:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:59:49 -0500 (EST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo To: William Lee Irwin III cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test11-wli-1 In-Reply-To: <20031209233523.GS8039@holomorphy.com> Message-ID: References: <20031204200120.GL19856@holomorphy.com> <20031209233523.GS8039@holomorphy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:01:20PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > > Successfully tested on a Thinkpad T21. Any feedback regarding > > performance would be very helpful. Desktop users should notice top(1) > > is faster, kernel hackers that kernel compiles are faster, and highmem > > users should see much less per-process lowmem overhead. > > Bill Davidsen reported an issue where compiled kernel images aren't > properly distinguished from mainline kernels' by installation scripts. > > The following patch should resolve this: Argh, i've been screaming about this for ages...