From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264145AbTLPAMR (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:12:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264270AbTLPAMR (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:12:17 -0500 Received: from dragnfire.mtl.istop.com ([66.11.160.179]:38342 "EHLO montezuma.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264145AbTLPAMQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:12:16 -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:11:14 -0500 (EST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo To: Nick Piggin cc: Rusty Russell , linux-kernel , Anton Blanchard , Ingo Molnar , "Martin J. Bligh" , "Nakajima, Jun" , Mark Wong Subject: Re: [CFT][RFC] HT scheduler In-Reply-To: <3FDE41BC.8000305@cyberone.com.au> Message-ID: References: <20031213022038.300B22C2C1@lists.samba.org> <3FDAB517.4000309@cyberone.com.au> <3FDE41BC.8000305@cyberone.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Nick Piggin wrote: > Thats weird. I assume you don't have problems with the regular SMP kernel. > Unfortunately I don't have an HT box I can do these sorts of tests with. > The first thing you could try is with CONFIG_SCHED_SMT 'N'. Yes the regular SMP kernel is fine, it's rather hard to work with so i had to back it out. i'll give it a go with CONFIG_SCHED_SMT a bit later in the week and let you know. Thanks