From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261317AbUKCBtW (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 20:49:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261329AbUKCBtV (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 20:49:21 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:28372 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261317AbUKCBtU (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 20:49:20 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 17:48:59 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: David Howells cc: Andrew Morton , davidm@snapgear.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, uclinux-dev@uclinux.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] FRV: Generate more useful debug info In-Reply-To: <5109.1099394496@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <20041101162929.63af1d0d.akpm@osdl.org> <76b4a884-2c3c-11d9-91a1-0002b3163499@redhat.com> <200411011930.iA1JUMgs023243@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <5109.1099394496@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, David Howells wrote: > > -O1: Dunno; if they don't they're buggy, and if they don't they're buggy. No. It used to be that inlining was only done with -O2 if I remember correctly. The kernel _needed_ to be compiled with -O2. That may not be true today, but what is true is that -O1 is not a light thing to just do. Linus