From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>,
Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>,
Eric Pouech <pouech-eric@wanadoo.fr>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Mike Hearn <mh@codeweavers.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, wine-devel <wine-devel@winehq.com>
Subject: Re: ptrace single-stepping change breaks Wine
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 20:29:06 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411212022510.20993@ppc970.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411211947200.11274@bigblue.dev.mdolabs.com>
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> So it seems it did not work even before, the gdb-SIGTRAP stepping. In
> 2.6.8 I get a straight segfault just for running it.
Ok, that at least means it's not a regression, although it may be that the
altered behaviour is enough to make some program work/not-work depending
on exactly what it is testing. My example is certainly not the only way to
try to mess up a debugger.
I'm by no means 100% sure that we should encourage the kind of programming
"skills" I showed with that example program, so in that sense this may not
be worth worrying about. That said, I do hate the notion of having
programs that are basically undebuggable, so from a QoI standpoint I'd
really like to say that you can run my horrid little program under the
debugger and see it work...
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-22 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 101+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411151439270.2222@ppc970.osdl.org>
2004-11-15 22:53 ` ptrace single-stepping change breaks Wine Roland McGrath
2004-11-19 19:00 ` Eric Pouech
2004-11-19 19:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-19 19:33 ` Eric Pouech
2004-11-19 19:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-19 20:41 ` Eric Pouech
2004-11-19 21:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-19 21:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-19 21:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-20 21:49 ` Jesse Allen
2004-11-21 4:55 ` Jesse Allen
2004-11-21 21:32 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-11-21 22:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-21 23:14 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-11-22 1:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-22 0:13 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-11-22 1:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-22 4:06 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-11-22 4:29 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2004-11-22 6:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-22 11:06 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-11-22 16:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-22 13:46 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-11-22 23:15 ` Jesse Allen
2004-11-22 23:48 ` Jesse Allen
2004-11-28 17:01 ` Eric Pouech
2004-11-22 20:52 ` Eric Pouech
2004-11-22 21:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-22 22:19 ` Mike Hearn
2004-11-22 22:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-29 2:14 ` Thomas Sailer
2004-12-29 15:02 ` Mike Hearn
2004-12-29 18:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-29 19:40 ` Jesse Allen
2004-12-29 20:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-29 21:43 ` Jesse Allen
2004-12-30 0:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-30 1:13 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-12-30 1:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-30 4:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-30 4:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-30 5:07 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-12-30 7:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-30 17:59 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-12-30 18:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-30 19:27 ` Jesse Allen
2004-12-30 19:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-30 22:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-30 23:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-30 23:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-31 5:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-31 5:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-31 7:00 ` Jesse Allen
2004-12-31 15:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-31 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-01 23:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-01-29 9:25 ` Kari Hurtta
2004-12-30 23:15 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-31 0:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-31 12:35 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-31 15:16 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-12-31 17:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-31 19:55 ` Jesse Allen
2004-12-31 17:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-31 4:55 ` Jesse Allen
2004-12-31 5:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-31 5:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-30 19:19 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-12-30 5:06 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-12-30 4:28 ` Jesse Allen
2004-12-29 20:56 ` Jesse Allen
2004-12-29 19:35 ` Thomas Sailer
2004-12-29 20:13 ` Jesse Allen
2004-12-30 1:49 ` Thomas Sailer
2004-12-30 2:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-30 2:39 ` Thomas Sailer
2004-12-30 2:57 ` Thomas Sailer
2004-12-30 3:15 ` Thomas Sailer
2004-12-30 4:15 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-30 10:09 ` Thomas Sailer
2004-12-30 13:06 ` Mike Hearn
2004-12-31 13:13 ` Thomas Sailer
2004-12-31 13:31 ` Mike Hearn
2004-12-31 15:42 ` Jesse Allen
2004-12-31 15:56 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-12-31 15:59 ` Jesse Allen
2004-12-31 22:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-01 22:04 ` Davide Libenzi
2005-01-01 22:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-02 3:46 ` Davide Libenzi
2005-01-07 4:51 ` minor nit with decoding popf instruction - was " John Kacur
2005-01-07 6:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-08 5:05 ` John Kacur
2004-12-31 15:51 ` Thomas Sailer
[not found] ` <1104873315.3557.87.camel@littlegreen>
2005-01-04 21:21 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-05 10:43 ` Thomas Sailer
2005-01-05 11:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-05 11:40 ` Alexandre Julliard
2004-12-30 12:11 ` Mike Hearn
2004-11-20 3:40 ` Roland McGrath
2004-11-19 20:59 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0411212022510.20993@ppc970.osdl.org \
--to=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dan@debian.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mh@codeweavers.com \
--cc=pouech-eric@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=wine-devel@winehq.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).