From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262728AbULQDbw (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:31:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262733AbULQDbw (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:31:52 -0500 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:6034 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262728AbULQDbu (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:31:50 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:31:43 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: William Lee Irwin III cc: Hugh Dickins , Nick Piggin , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: page fault scalability patch V12 [0/7]: Overview and performance tests In-Reply-To: <20041212212456.GB2714@holomorphy.com> Message-ID: References: <41BBF923.6040207@yahoo.com.au> <20041212212456.GB2714@holomorphy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 09:33:11AM +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > Oh, hold on, isn't handle_mm_fault's pmd without page_table_lock > > similarly racy, in both the 64-on-32 cases, and on architectures > > which have a more complex pmd_t (sparc, m68k, h8300)? Sigh. > > yes. Those may fall back to use the page_table_lock for individual operations that cannot be realized in an atomic way.