From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261284AbVALRxM (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:53:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261282AbVALRxM (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:53:12 -0500 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:28035 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261279AbVALRxK (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:53:10 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:52:53 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig cc: Andrew Morton , Nick Piggin , torvalds@osdl.org, ak@muc.de, hugh@veritas.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: page table lock patch V15 [0/7]: overview In-Reply-To: <20050112174101.GA5838@infradead.org> Message-ID: References: <41E4BCBE.2010001@yahoo.com.au> <20050112014235.7095dcf4.akpm@osdl.org> <20050112164906.GA4935@infradead.org> <20050112174101.GA5838@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > These smaller systems are more likely x86/x86_64 machines ;-) But they will not have been build in 1998 either like the machine I used for the i386 tests. Could you do some tests on contemporary x86/x86_64 SMP systems with large memory?