From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262878AbVDHRMr (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:12:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262880AbVDHRMq (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:12:46 -0400 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:13199 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262878AbVDHRMf (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:12:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:14:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Matthias-Christian Ott cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Chris Wedgwood , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Kernel SCM saga.. In-Reply-To: <4256AE0D.201@tiscali.de> Message-ID: References: <20050408041341.GA8720@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20050408071428.GB3957@opteron.random> <4256AE0D.201@tiscali.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: > > SQL Databases like SQLite aren't slow. After applying a patch, I can do a complete "show-diff" on the kernel tree to see the effect of it in about 0.15 seconds. Also, I can use rsync to efficiently replicate my database without having to re-send the whole crap - it only needs to send the new stuff. You do that with an sql database, and I'll be impressed. Linus