From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262526AbVGMAL1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:11:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262521AbVGMAL0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:11:26 -0400 Received: from unused.mind.net ([69.9.134.98]:62123 "EHLO echo.lysdexia.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262530AbVGMAJq (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:09:46 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:08:58 -0700 (PDT) From: William Weston X-X-Sender: weston@echo.lysdexia.org To: Karsten Wiese cc: Daniel Walker , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24 In-Reply-To: <200507130204.08824.annabellesgarden@yahoo.de> Message-ID: References: <200507121223.10704.annabellesgarden@yahoo.de> <20050712140251.GB18296@elte.hu> <1121178339.10199.8.camel@c-67-188-6-232.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <200507130204.08824.annabellesgarden@yahoo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Karsten Wiese wrote: > i've only tested on 2005ish Ahlon64_UP@k8T800: it doesn't need any of the quirks > IOAPIC_POSTFLUSH, sis_bug, level-edge cleanup. > IOAPIC_POSTFLUSH caused no negative influence neither. > i've an io_apic_one.c here, that doesn't have any of the quirks and is stripped down > to handle just one ioapic. It runs just fine on PREEMPT_RT. > Could be used as a "Do i crash/suffer without the quirks?" test for 1 ioapic equipped machines. > Should i post it? Please do. I'll give it a spin on several machines and let you know how it goes ;-} --ww