From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750705AbVI1SD5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:03:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750708AbVI1SD5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:03:57 -0400 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:11457 "HELO xenotime.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750705AbVI1SD4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:03:56 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:03:52 -0700 (PDT) From: "Randy.Dunlap" X-X-Sender: rddunlap@shark.he.net To: Paul Jackson cc: Linus Torvalds , kurosawa@valinux.co.jp, taka@valinux.co.jp, magnus.damm@gmail.com, dino@in.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset read past eof memory leak fix In-Reply-To: <20050928105316.0684c7cf.pj@sgi.com> Message-ID: References: <20050908225539.0bc1acf6.pj@sgi.com> <20050909.203849.33293224.taka@valinux.co.jp> <20050909063131.64dc8155.pj@sgi.com> <20050910.161145.74742186.taka@valinux.co.jp> <20050910015209.4f581b8a.pj@sgi.com> <20050926093432.9975870043@sv1.valinux.co.jp> <20050927013751.47cbac8b.pj@sgi.com> <20050927113902.C78A570046@sv1.valinux.co.jp> <20050928092558.61F6170041@sv1.valinux.co.jp> <20050928064224.49170ca7.pj@sgi.com> <20050928105316.0684c7cf.pj@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Paul Jackson wrote: > Linus wrote: > > please for the future keep authorship intact by having > > a "From: ... > > You guessed right. Your non-technical note was applicable. > > Andrew - why doesn't your "The perfect patch" mention this? > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt > > Linus - would you like a patch to Documentation/SubmittingPatches > that mentions this? > > Hmmm ... I don't even see the "Acked-by" in these patch guides either. > Probably I should include that in SubmittingPatches as well. > > Too bad that first line doesn't start "Author:" instead of "From:". > Oh well - I see Andrew already suggested that, and you declined. > (You should'a listened to him ;). Paul, did you see Linus's email on the canonical patch format? (I can understand if you missed it. :) http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0504.0/1865.html -- ~Randy