From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932184AbWAPHBH (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:01:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932187AbWAPHBH (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:01:07 -0500 Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:3032 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932184AbWAPHBG (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:01:06 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:00:56 +0200 (EET) From: Pekka J Enberg To: Andrew Morton cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, manfred@colorfullife.com Subject: Re: [patch 04/10] slab: cache_estimate cleanup In-Reply-To: <20060115183822.38b1e807.akpm@osdl.org> Message-ID: References: <20060114122249.246354000@localhost> <20060114122415.163755000@localhost> <20060115183822.38b1e807.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Pekka Enberg" wrote: > > - size_t wastage = PAGE_SIZE << gfporder; > > - size_t extra = 0; > > - size_t base = 0; > > ... > > + size_t mgmt_size; > > + size_t slab_size = PAGE_SIZE << gfporder; On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Andrew Morton wrote: > Can anyone think of a reason for using size_t in there instead of plain old > unsigned int? Not really but unsigned long would probably be safer. Pekka