From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1751151AbWAZVda@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751151AbWAZVda (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:33:30 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751213AbWAZVda
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:33:30 -0500
Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.8]:12757 "EHLO
	mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751151AbWAZVd3 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:33:29 -0500
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:33:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Vadim Lobanov <vlobanov@speakeasy.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
cc: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>, matthias.andree@gmx.de,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was:
  Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0601262204370.27891@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0601261332000.2917@shell2.speakeasy.net>
References: <20060123165415.GA32178@merlin.emma.line.org>
 <1138035602.2977.54.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20060123180106.GA4879@merlin.emma.line.org>
 <1138039993.2977.62.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20060123185549.GA15985@merlin.emma.line.org>
 <43D530CC.nailC4Y11KE7A@burner> <1138048255.21481.15.camel@mindpipe>
 <20060123212119.GI1820@merlin.emma.line.org> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0601241823390.28682@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
 <43D78585.nailD7855YVBX@burner> <20060125142155.GW4212@suse.de>
 <Pine.LNX.4.61.0601251544400.31234@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> <43D7AE00.nailDFJ61L10Z@burner>
 <Pine.LNX.4.61.0601262204370.27891@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

>
> (removing Jens and Lee, as previous posts made that quite clear)
>
> >> I'm getting a grin:
> >>
> >> 15:46 takeshi:../drivers/ide > find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep SG_IO
> >> (no results)
> >>
> >> Looks like it's already non-redundant :)
> >
> >everything in drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c  is duplicate code and I am sure I
> >would find more if I take some time....
>
> In what linux kernel version have you found that file?
>

In taking a look at http://sosdg.org/~coywolf/lxr/ ...
That file exists in versions 2.6.10 through 2.6.14. It's gone from
2.6.15 and onward, however.
No comment as to the validity of its contents to the argument at hand.
:-)

>
> Jan Engelhardt
> --

- Vadim Lobanov