From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932677AbWBTHI4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 02:08:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932678AbWBTHI4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 02:08:56 -0500 Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:61848 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932677AbWBTHIz (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 02:08:55 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:08:46 +0200 (EET) From: Pekka J Enberg To: Greg KH cc: Adrian Bunk , Robert Love , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , John Stultz Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions In-Reply-To: <20060220010205.GB22738@suse.de> Message-ID: References: <20060217231444.GM4422@stusta.de> <84144f020602190306o3149d51by82b8ccc6108af012@mail.gmail.com> <20060219145442.GA4971@stusta.de> <1140383653.11403.8.camel@localhost> <20060220010205.GB22738@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Greg KH wrote: > That's _really_ odd, as hal, udev and dbus all work just fine on my > machines with the above changeset (actually with 2.6.16-rc4). And that > changeset should not have caused anything to change with regards to the > core uevent code, as it's a usb-serial change only. > > And you don't even have CONFIG_USB_SERIAL enabled... Very odd. > > If you revert this one patch, on top of a clean 2.6.16-rc4, do things > start working for you again? Probably not. For some reason, I had udev and hal failing for plain 2.6.15 too until I did make mrproper. So the bisect results are probably not reliable. I'll do that again this evening with mrproper. Uh. Pekka