linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/10] Re: [2.6-BK-URL] NTFS: 2.1.19 sparse annotation, cleanups and a bugfix
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 21:02:05 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0409242059420.5443@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0409240926580.32117@ppc970.osdl.org>

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> >    - Fix all the sparse bitwise warnings.  Had to change all the enums
> >      storing little endian values to #defines because we cannot set enums
> >      to be little endian so we had lots of bitwise warnings from sparse.
> 
> Btw, Al is fixing this. We'll make enum's properly typed, rather than just 
> plain integers. It's not traditional C behaviour, but it gives you better 
> type safety, and Al points out that other C compilers (the Plan 9 one, to 
> be specific) have done the same thing for similar reasons.
> 
> So we'll eventually be able to use enum's instead of #defines without
> losing any sparse information.
> 
> Of course, the only case where it matters is exactly cases like this, 
> where the difference between using an enum and a #define is basically a 
> matter of taste. But since I agree that enum's can look a lot nicer, it's 
> good to know that it's being worked on.

This is good news.  Once that is done I will be very happy to go back to 
using enums as I also agree that they can and in this case do look a 
lot nicer...

Best regards,

	Anton
-- 
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net
WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-24 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-24 16:11 [2.6-BK-URL] NTFS: 2.1.19 sparse annotation, cleanups and a bugfix Anton Altaparmakov
2004-09-24 16:12 ` [PATCH 1/10] " Anton Altaparmakov
2004-09-24 16:12   ` [PATCH 2/10] " Anton Altaparmakov
2004-09-24 16:13     ` [PATCH 3/10] " Anton Altaparmakov
2004-09-24 16:13       ` [PATCH 4/10] " Anton Altaparmakov
2004-09-24 16:13         ` [PATCH 5/10] " Anton Altaparmakov
2004-09-24 16:13           ` [PATCH 6/10] " Anton Altaparmakov
2004-09-24 16:14             ` [PATCH 7/10] " Anton Altaparmakov
2004-09-24 16:14               ` [PATCH 8/10] " Anton Altaparmakov
2004-09-24 16:15                 ` [PATCH 9/10] " Anton Altaparmakov
2004-09-24 16:15                   ` [PATCH 10/10] " Anton Altaparmakov
2004-09-24 16:30                 ` [PATCH 8/10] " Linus Torvalds
2004-09-24 20:02                   ` Anton Altaparmakov [this message]
2004-09-25  2:46                     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-25  7:25                       ` viro
2004-09-25 15:43                         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-26  7:48                           ` Anton Altaparmakov
2004-09-26 16:39                             ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-26  7:47                       ` Anton Altaparmakov
2004-09-26  7:51                         ` Anton Altaparmakov
2004-09-25  6:38               ` [PATCH 7/10] " viro
2004-09-25 23:31                 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2004-09-25  6:35             ` [PATCH 6/10] " viro
2004-09-25 23:09               ` Anton Altaparmakov
2004-09-26  0:10                 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2004-09-25  6:32         ` [PATCH 4/10] " viro
2004-09-26  0:06           ` Anton Altaparmakov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.60.0409242059420.5443@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk \
    --to=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).