From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261548AbVAGUBg (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:01:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261581AbVAGUA7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:00:59 -0500 Received: from smtp.dei.uc.pt ([193.137.203.228]:29583 "EHLO smtp.dei.uc.pt") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261548AbVAGT4e (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:56:34 -0500 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:54:43 +0000 (WET) From: "Marcos D. Marado Torres" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: grsecurity 2.1.0 release / 5 Linux kernel advisories (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-UC-FCT-DEI-MailScanner-Information: Please contact helpdesk@dei.uc.pt for more information X-UC-FCT-DEI-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: marado@student.dei.uc.pt Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- /* *************************************************************** */ Marcos Daniel Marado Torres AKA Mind Booster Noori http://student.dei.uc.pt/~marado - marado@student.dei.uc.pt () Join the ASCII ribbon campaign against html email, Microsoft /\ attachments and Software patents. They endanger the World. Sign a petition against patents: http://petition.eurolinux.org /* *************************************************************** */ - ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:18:53 -0500 From: Brad Spengler To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com, bugtraq@securityfocus.com, dailydave@lists.immunitysec.com Subject: grsecurity 2.1.0 release / 5 Linux kernel advisories Let's try this again, since web archives don't like multipart attachments. grsecurity 2.1.0 release / Linux Kernel advisories - -------------------------------------------------------------------- Table Of Contents: 1) grsecurity 2.1.0 announcement and changelog 2) Linux Kernel advisory introduction 3) 2.4/2.6 random poolsize sysctl handler integer overflow 4) 2.6 scsi ioctl integer overflow and information leak 5) 2.2/2.4/2.6 moxa serial driver bss overflow 6) 2.4/2.6 RLIMIT_MEMLOCK bypass and (2.6) unprivileged user DoS 7) Attachments, including patches for all vulns, a POC for #3, and a working exploit for #6 1) grsecurity 2.1.0 announcement and changelog I'm happy to announce the release of grsecurity 2.1.0. It is being released initially for the 2.4.28 and 2.6.10 kernels and will be ported immediately to the next kernel versions when released. It can be downloaded at http://www.grsecurity.net. We are still actively seeking sponsorship, so if you benefit from using grsecurity and like the changes you see in 2.1.0, please consider sponsoring the future development and maintenance of the project. Changes in this release include: * New configuration file for full learning: /etc/grsec/learn_config * Learning heuristics have been optimized to better detect temporary file usage and reduce appropriately. * Learning heuristics have been modified to weight against reducing certain additional important directories. * User/group ID transitions have been added to the learning system. Any subject transitioning to less than 3 different users or 3 different groups that has CAP_SETUID or CAP_SETGID will have ID transitions added. This is useful to automatically secure applications that only transition to one or few users/groups like nobody/nogroup. * /proc//* accesses are automatically rewritten as /proc by grlearn before being cached and written to disk * The inherit-based learning usable through the learning configuration file is usable through a regular policy as well simply by adding "i" instead of "l" to a subject for learning. * Inheritance is preserved whenever possible across uid/gid changes when the role resulting from the uid/gid change is no different from that before the change. * A complete ~95-99% efficient LFU-hash hybrid caching system has been added that greatly reduces the number of full object lookups by caching the result. The cache essentially mimics the filesystem around where applications are operating: nearly equivalent to having an object for every file and directory on the system, but without the wasted memory. The cache is invalidated on creates and deletes that cause a change in policy (through policy re-creation) and on renames of directories or symlinks. * Memory usage for non-full learning has been significantly reduced and all memory leaks have been plugged. * A new object mode has been added for hardlinks for more fine-grained permissions. See the sample policy file for information on what permissions are required to create a hardlink. Its corresponding audit flag has been added as well. * Destruction of unused shared memory feature added and included in the sysctl framework of grsecurity. This feature was ported from Openwall (http://www.openwall.com/linux). * A new option was added to the sysctl feature that enables at boot all features enabled in the kernel configuration, while allowing them to be changed via the sysctl interface until grsec_lock is set. * Policy statistics have been added to gradm that provide useful, security-relevant information on the policy you are loading into the kernel. You can view these statistics when enabling the system by running gradm -V -E. * Interactive performance of full-learning has improved by ~15% by reducing the number of context switches caused by grlearn doing small disk writes by using a write buffer (writing more once instead of less 1000 times) and keeping track of log entry lengths for quicker string matching. A signal handler was added to grlearn so that when learning is stopped, the write buffer is flushed to disk. * Kernel headers are no longer used for gradm * Updates from the PaX project (http://pax.grsecurity.net) * Bugfixes for things mentioned on the list, etc When patching your kernel for the 2.4.28 and 2.6.10 kernels, since they contain several vulnerabilities, make sure to also apply the secfix patches located on the website. 2) Linux Kernel advisory introduction Let me begin by giving you a timeline: December 15th: I send Linus a mail with a subject line of "RLIMIT_MEMLOCK bypass with locked stack" December 27th: The PaX team sends Linus a mail with a subject line of "2.6.9+ mlockall/expand_down DoS by unprivileged users" January 2nd: The PaX team resends the previous mail to Linux and Andrew Morton Between December 15th and today, Linus has committed many changes to the kernel. Between January 2nd and today, Andrew Morton has committed several changes to the kernel. 3 weeks is a sufficient amount of time to be able to expect even a reply about a given vulnerability. A patch for the vulnerability was attached to the mails, and in the PaX team's mails, a working exploit as well. Private notification of vulnerabilities is a privilege, and when that privilege is abused by not responding promptly, it deserves to be revoked. Using 'advanced static analysis': "cd drivers; grep copy_from_user -r ./* | grep -v sizeof", I discovered 4 exploitable vulnerabilities in a matter of 15 minutes. More vulnerabilities were found in 2.6 than in 2.4. It's a pretty sad state of affairs for Linux security when someone can find 4 exploitable vulnerabilities in a matter of minutes. Since there was no point in sending more vulnerability reports when the first hadn't even been responded to, I'm including all four of them in this mail, as well as a POC for the poolsize bug. The other bugs can have POCs written for just as trivially. The poolsize bug requires uid 0, but not any root capabilities. The scsi and serial bugs depend on the permissions of their respective devices, and thus can possibly be exploited as non-root. The scsi bug in particular has a couple different attack vectors that I haven't even bothered to investigate. Some of these bugs have gone unfixed for several years. The PaX team discovered the mlockall DoS. It has been fixed in PaX for 2 years. I have attached their mail and exploit code. I'd really like to know what's being done about this pitiful trend of Linux security, where it's 10x as easy to find a vulnerability in the kernel than it is in any app on the system, where isec releases at least one critical vulnerability for each kernel version. I don't see that the 2.6 development model is doing anything to help this (as the spectrum of these vulnerabilities demonstrate), by throwing experimental code into the kernel and claiming it to be "stable". Hopefully now these vulnerabilities will be fixed in a timely manner. 3) 2.4/2.6 random poolsize sysctl handler integer overflow In drivers/char/random.c: at poolsize_strategy(): > int len; ^ signed integer > > sysctl_poolsize = random_state->poolinfo.POOLBYTES; > > /* > > /* > * We only handle the write case, since the read case gets > * handled by the default handler (and we don't care if the > * write case happens twice; it's harmless). > */ > if (newval && newlen) { > len = newlen; ^ unsigned int converted to signed > if (len > table->maxlen) ^ comparison of two signed integers > len = table->maxlen; > if (copy_from_user(table->data, newval, len)) ^ copy_from_user with len possibly > table->maxlen 4) 2.6 scsi ioctl integer overflow and information leak In drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c: at sg_scsi_ioctl(): > struct request *rq; > int err, in_len, out_len, bytes, opcode, cmdlen; ^ in_len, out_len are signed int > char *buffer = NULL, sense[SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE]; > > /* > * get in an out lengths, verify they don't exceed a page worth of data > */ > if (get_user(in_len, &sic->inlen)) ^ in_len is user-controlled > return -EFAULT; > if (get_user(out_len, &sic->outlen)) ^ out_len is user-controlled > return -EFAULT; > if (in_len > PAGE_SIZE || out_len > PAGE_SIZE) ^ signed int only has upper bound checked > return -EINVAL; > if (get_user(opcode, sic->data)) > return -EFAULT; > bytes = max(in_len, out_len); ... > rq->cmd_len = cmdlen; > if (copy_from_user(rq->cmd, sic->data, cmdlen)) > goto error; > > if (copy_from_user(buffer, sic->data + cmdlen, in_len)) ^ copy_from_user with size possibly > PAGE_SIZE > goto error; ... > if (copy_to_user(sic->data, buffer, out_len)) ^ copy_to_user with size possibly > PAGE_SIZE > err = -EFAULT; 5) 2.2/2.4/2.6 moxa serial driver bss overflow In drivers/char/moxa.c: >static unsigned char moxaBuff[10240]; In MoxaDriverIoctl(): > if(copy_from_user(&dltmp, argp, sizeof(struct dl_str))) > return -EFAULT; ^ dltmp.len is user-controlled > if(dltmp.cardno < 0 || dltmp.cardno >= MAX_BOARDS) > return -EINVAL; > > switch(cmd) > { > case MOXA_LOAD_BIOS: > i = moxaloadbios(dltmp.cardno, dltmp.buf, dltmp.len); ^ called with no length checking > return (i); > case MOXA_FIND_BOARD: > return moxafindcard(dltmp.cardno); > case MOXA_LOAD_C320B: > moxaload320b(dltmp.cardno, dltmp.buf, dltmp.len); ^ called with no length checking > default: /* to keep gcc happy */ > return (0); > case MOXA_LOAD_CODE: > i = moxaloadcode(dltmp.cardno, dltmp.buf, dltmp.len); ^ called with no length checking In moxaloadbios(): >static int moxaloadbios(int cardno, unsigned char __user *tmp, int len) >{ > void __iomem *baseAddr; > int i; > > if(copy_from_user(moxaBuff, tmp, len)) ^ copy_from_user with no length checking > return -EFAULT; In moxaloadcode(): > static int moxaloadcode(int cardno, unsigned char __user *tmp, int len) > { > void __iomem *baseAddr, *ofsAddr; > int retval, port, i; > > if(copy_from_user(moxaBuff, tmp, len)) ^ copy_from_user with no length checking > return -EFAULT; In moxaload320b(): >static int moxaload320b(int cardno, unsigned char __user *tmp, int len) >{ > void __iomem *baseAddr; > int i; > > if(len > sizeof(moxaBuff)) ^ signed int has only upper-bound checked > return -EINVAL; > if(copy_from_user(moxaBuff, tmp, len)) ^ copy_from_user with len possibly > sizeof(moxaBuff) > return -EFAULT; 6) 2.4/2.6 RLIMIT_MEMLOCK bypass and (2.6) unprivileged user DoS Taken from the mail from the PaX team to Linus and Andrew Morton: the 'culprit' patch is how the default RLIM_MEMLOCK and the privilege to call mlockall have changed in 2.6.9. namely, the former has been reduced to 32 pages while the latter has been relaxed to allow it for otherwise unprivileged users if their RLIM_MEMLOCK is bigger than the currently allocated vm. which is normally good enough, except as you now know there's a path that can increase the allocated vm without checking for RLIM_MEMLOCK. i'm attaching a small i386-specific demonstration, use the makefile to create the small self-contained executable, e.g., 'make alloc=0x100000' to have it allocate 1MB of stack and lock all of it. for demonstrating the full effect of locking down arbitrary amounts of memory, you'll have to set your stack rlimit to infinity (ulimit -s unlimited) and allocate as much memory as your memory overcommit policy allows (this may mean that you'll have to run multiple instances, if you have lots of memory). surprisingly, in my tests the kernel survived pretty well, it just crawled to a snail's speed as every mapped page access required disk i/o ;-). i didn't play with overcommit policies nor any special workloads, so there may very well be worse effects with that much locked memory. in any case, this may warrant 2.6.10.1 because as soon as the fix goes into -bk, anyone reading the logs can easily figure it out and reproduce the 'exploit'. the attached patch is the excerpt from PaX that survives the exploit, so i think it's good to go. 7) Attachments expoits_and_patches.tgz can be downloaded at: http://grsecurity.net/~spender/exploits_and_patches.tgz -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFB3ukImNlq8m+oD34RAlwFAJ9IpoQRMmdhsPjdJlH8Mxct3yGZTwCeOuaD n855Y0P+FCBVUSaEDl17hmo= =6g/V -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----