* Maybe 2.6.10.1 ?
@ 2005-01-08 10:25 Maciej Soltysiak
2005-01-09 1:35 ` Jesper Juhl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Maciej Soltysiak @ 2005-01-08 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hello,
Maybe we should release 2.6.10.1 with those security fixes,
so people maintaining other trees like: -tiny, -ck, -grsec,
release patches over the fixed ones. Users won't miss the
fixes if they prefer some trees instead of vanilla.
What do you think?
Regars,
Maciej
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Maybe 2.6.10.1 ?
2005-01-08 10:25 Maybe 2.6.10.1 ? Maciej Soltysiak
@ 2005-01-09 1:35 ` Jesper Juhl
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jesper Juhl @ 2005-01-09 1:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maciej Soltysiak; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Maciej Soltysiak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Maybe we should release 2.6.10.1 with those security fixes,
> so people maintaining other trees like: -tiny, -ck, -grsec,
> release patches over the fixed ones. Users won't miss the
> fixes if they prefer some trees instead of vanilla.
>
> What do you think?
>
I'd suggest (and I'm a comlete nobody in this regard) that instead Linus
takes the security fixes + whatever he and Andrew deems to be "obviously
correct and with zero risk of causing trouble" from the current -bk and
turns that into 2.6.11-rc1, then let that stew for 2 or 3 days, then
unless someone sees something horribly wrong, release it as 2.6.11 - then
take whatever else is in current -bk and adds it and then that'll be
2.6.11-bk1 and we move on from there.
--
Jesper Juhl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-01-09 1:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-08 10:25 Maybe 2.6.10.1 ? Maciej Soltysiak
2005-01-09 1:35 ` Jesper Juhl
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).