linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>
To: Steve Bergman <steve@rueb.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Proper procedure for reporting possible security vulnerabilities?
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:11:27 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501102309270.2987@dragon.hygekrogen.localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41E2F6B3.9060008@rueb.com>

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Steve Bergman wrote:

> Florian Weimer wrote:
> 
> > Contact your vendor.  You are using vendor kernels, are you? 8-)
> >  
> 
> Actually I am having a discussion with a Pax Team member about how the recent
> exploits discovered by the grsecurity guys should have been handled.  They
> clam that they sent email to Linus and Andrew and did not receive a response
> for 3 weeks, and that is why they released exploit code into the wild.
> 
> Anyone here have any comments on what I should tell him?
> 
I don't know what other people would do or what the general feeling on 
the list is, but personally I'd send such reports to the maintainer and 
CC lkml, if there is no maintainer I'd just send to lkml.

-- 
Jesper Juhl


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-01-10 22:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-10 16:46 Steve Bergman
2005-01-10 18:23 ` Indrek Kruusa
2005-01-10 19:24 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-11  9:32   ` Florian Weimer
2005-01-10 21:31 ` Florian Weimer
2005-01-10 21:42   ` Steve Bergman
2005-01-10 22:08     ` Diego Calleja
2005-01-11  0:19       ` Barry K. Nathan
2005-01-11  0:45         ` Diego Calleja
2005-01-11  9:35         ` Florian Weimer
2005-01-11 16:57         ` Jesper Juhl
2005-01-11 17:05           ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-01-10 22:09     ` linux-os
2005-01-11  0:44       ` Barry K. Nathan
2005-01-10 22:11     ` Jesper Juhl [this message]
2005-01-11  0:40       ` Chris Wright
2005-01-11  1:09         ` Diego Calleja
2005-01-11  1:18           ` Chris Wright
2005-01-11 17:05         ` Jesper Juhl
2005-01-11 16:39           ` Alan Cox
2005-01-11 21:25             ` Jesper Juhl
2005-01-11 21:29               ` Chris Wright
2005-01-12 21:05                 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-01-17 22:49                 ` Werner Almesberger
2005-01-17 22:52                   ` Chris Wright
2005-01-17 23:23                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-17 23:26                       ` Chris Wright
2005-01-17 23:57                         ` Alan Cox
2005-01-18  1:08                           ` Chris Wright
2005-01-11 17:57           ` Chris Wright
2005-01-12 12:23           ` Florian Weimer
2005-01-11  9:49       ` Florian Weimer
2005-01-11 16:10     ` Alan Cox
2005-01-12 12:33       ` Florian Weimer
2005-01-13 15:36         ` Alan Cox
     [not found] <200501101959.j0AJxUvl032294@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl>
2005-01-10 21:36 ` Indrek Kruusa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.61.0501102309270.2987@dragon.hygekrogen.localhost \
    --to=juhl-lkml@dif.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steve@rueb.com \
    --subject='Re: Proper procedure for reporting possible security vulnerabilities?' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).