From: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>
To: Steve Bergman <steve@rueb.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Proper procedure for reporting possible security vulnerabilities?
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:11:27 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501102309270.2987@dragon.hygekrogen.localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41E2F6B3.9060008@rueb.com>
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Steve Bergman wrote:
> Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> > Contact your vendor. You are using vendor kernels, are you? 8-)
> >
>
> Actually I am having a discussion with a Pax Team member about how the recent
> exploits discovered by the grsecurity guys should have been handled. They
> clam that they sent email to Linus and Andrew and did not receive a response
> for 3 weeks, and that is why they released exploit code into the wild.
>
> Anyone here have any comments on what I should tell him?
>
I don't know what other people would do or what the general feeling on
the list is, but personally I'd send such reports to the maintainer and
CC lkml, if there is no maintainer I'd just send to lkml.
--
Jesper Juhl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-10 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-10 16:46 Proper procedure for reporting possible security vulnerabilities? Steve Bergman
2005-01-10 18:23 ` Indrek Kruusa
2005-01-10 19:24 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-11 9:32 ` Florian Weimer
2005-01-10 21:31 ` Florian Weimer
2005-01-10 21:42 ` Steve Bergman
2005-01-10 22:08 ` Diego Calleja
2005-01-11 0:19 ` Barry K. Nathan
2005-01-11 0:45 ` Diego Calleja
2005-01-11 9:35 ` Florian Weimer
2005-01-11 16:57 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-01-11 17:05 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-01-10 22:09 ` linux-os
2005-01-11 0:44 ` Barry K. Nathan
2005-01-10 22:11 ` Jesper Juhl [this message]
2005-01-11 0:40 ` Chris Wright
2005-01-11 1:09 ` Diego Calleja
2005-01-11 1:18 ` Chris Wright
2005-01-11 17:05 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-01-11 16:39 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-11 21:25 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-01-11 21:29 ` Chris Wright
2005-01-12 21:05 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-01-17 22:49 ` Werner Almesberger
2005-01-17 22:52 ` Chris Wright
2005-01-17 23:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-17 23:26 ` Chris Wright
2005-01-17 23:57 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-18 1:08 ` Chris Wright
2005-01-11 17:57 ` Chris Wright
2005-01-12 12:23 ` Florian Weimer
2005-01-11 9:49 ` Florian Weimer
2005-01-11 16:10 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-12 12:33 ` Florian Weimer
2005-01-13 15:36 ` Alan Cox
[not found] <200501101959.j0AJxUvl032294@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl>
2005-01-10 21:36 ` Indrek Kruusa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.61.0501102309270.2987@dragon.hygekrogen.localhost \
--to=juhl-lkml@dif.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steve@rueb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).