From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
To: Jay Roplekar <jay_roplekar@hotmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel bug: mm/rmap.c:483
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:07:17 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501241813560.5795@goblin.wat.veritas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200501231055.08965.jay_roplekar@hotmail.com>
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005, Jay Roplekar wrote:
> I am not sure this is a fixed problem in 2.6.11-rc2 based on my read of the
> changelog, hence this email. Here is the summary:
>
> 1. I started with vanilla 2.6.10 where I replaced ieee1394 drivers from trunk
> rev 1251 patched in. My kernel is tainted due to ndiswrapper that loads
> windows drivers for my wireless PCI card.
Thanks for identifying that.
> One out of 4 times I actually
> booted 2.6.10 and manually brought up wlan0 I got 'reboot needed etc
> messages' . Please note that using similar approach in 2.6.8 does not cause
> this issue. Following is the error in /var/log/messages ( I did not paste
> everything to be brief):
>
> Jan 22 08:26:58 localhost kernel: Bad page state at prep_new_page (in process
> 'net_applet', page c1323a00)
> Jan 22 08:26:58 localhost kernel: flags:0x20000004 mapping:00000000 mapcount:1
> count:1
This is a different case from any I've seen reported before: we've seen
several "mapcount:1 count:0" reports, but here you have "mapcount:1 count:1"
which is evidence plus confirmation that the page is really in use.
Yet prep_new_page is being called while (re!)allocating this page that's
already in use. Sounds like a disagreement between page counts and the
buddy system. But the most obvious cause of that, misuse of a high-order
page by freeing a lower-order page from within it, should hit the BUG_ON
in put_page_testzero before ever getting this far.
So, sorry, I've no idea.
> Jan 22 08:26:58 localhost kernel: Backtrace:
> Jan 22 08:26:58 localhost kernel: [dump_stack+30/32] dump_stack+0x1e/0x20
> Jan 22 08:26:58 localhost kernel: [<c0103cde>] dump_stack+0x1e/0x20
> Jan 22 08:26:58 localhost kernel: [bad_page+117/176] bad_page+0x75/0xb0
> Jan 22 08:26:58 localhost kernel: [<c013c1b5>] bad_page+0x75/0xb0
> Jan 22 08:26:58 localhost kernel: [prep_new_page+40/112]
> prep_new_page+0x28/0x70
> Jan 22 08:26:58 localhost kernel: [<c013c4d8>] prep_new_page+0x28/0x70
You've edited out the full stacktrace for brevity; and were probably
quite right to do so, the state of this page is not likely to have
anything to do with the process it's now being allocated to.
> #####
> Jan 22 08:26:58 localhost kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
> Jan 22 08:26:58 localhost kernel: kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:483!
And this is just a consequence of bad_page resetting mapcount from 1 to 0
(well, from 0 to -1 if you delve into how those counts are implemented):
just further confirmation that the reallocated page was really in use.
> 2. I patched in Hugh's patch to 2.6.10 and recompiled. At reboot I ran
> memtest86 v 1.26, 3 times without any error. Then rebooting in 2.6.10 and
> doing ifup wlan0 gave me system freeze and unfortunately nothing in the log.
> Since then I have not seen the same error again after 3 reboots and 2-3 cold
> boots followed by ifup. I also tried cycles of ifdown and ifup without any
> errors.
Both that patch and memtest86 are good responses,
though I doubt my patch will actually help us much in your case.
> 3. I am not sure if I should post my whole config here hence I just pasting
> DRM related entries here in reference to your original email to Jose`. I
> have VIA motherboard and a matrox agp card, [FWIW most of the config is same
> as for 2.6.8 kernel that did not show the rmap sympton]
>
> CONFIG_AGP_VIA=m
> CONFIG_DRM=y
> CONFIG_DRM_MGA=m
DRM again, hmm, thanks, yes, useful info.
> I will be glad to provide any other info needed. You may bcc to my email if
> this is better discussed off the list. [Although I will anxiously check
> lkml.org everyday or use RSS feed]. I am not subsribed as We are not
> worthy :-)
Your worthiness is manifest, in all you've said, and left unsaid.
All I can say for now is, please let us know if you get more such traces.
Thanks,
Hugh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-24 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-23 16:55 Kernel bug: mm/rmap.c:483 Jay Roplekar
2005-01-24 19:07 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-24 13:19 0602
2005-01-24 19:41 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-01-16 21:12 man_josewanadoo.es
2005-01-17 12:21 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.61.0501241813560.5795@goblin.wat.veritas.com \
--to=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=jay_roplekar@hotmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).