From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161104AbWAHTaT (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:30:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161103AbWAHTaT (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:30:19 -0500 Received: from linux01.gwdg.de ([134.76.13.21]:29353 "EHLO linux01.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161104AbWAHTaS (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:30:18 -0500 Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:29:43 +0100 (MET) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Greg KH cc: Adrian Bunk , Alessandro Suardi , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: 2.6.15-git2: CONFIGFS_FS shows up as M/y choice, help says "if unsure, say N" In-Reply-To: <20060108162743.GA27234@kroah.com> Message-ID: References: <5a4c581d0601061310j3f4eb310o1d68c0b87c278685@mail.gmail.com> <20060106223032.GZ18439@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <20060107220959.GA3774@stusta.de> <20060108021630.GA3771@kroah.com> <20060108162743.GA27234@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> >> Why is CONFIGFS_FS a user-visible option? >> > >> >I think it should be the same as SYSFS, only changable from the EMBEDDED >> >portion. >> > >> At its present state, no distribution uses configfs afaik, so I'd love to >> have that turned off to not enlarge the kernel binary unnecessary. > >Well, ocfs2 needs it, and as that just hit mainline, it's a bit unfair >to state that no distro uses it (and I think that it's even untrue, look >for the distros that ship ocfs2...) Well ok. What I mean is: I don't want to have configfs if I do not also want ocfs2. Jan Engelhardt --