From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964836AbWAQUkP (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:40:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964837AbWAQUkO (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:40:14 -0500 Received: from linux01.gwdg.de ([134.76.13.21]:14787 "EHLO linux01.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964836AbWAQUkN (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:40:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:39:53 +0100 (MET) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Trond Myklebust cc: Justin Piszcz , Alan Cox , Tomasz =?iso-8859-2?Q?K=B3oczko?= , Phil Oester , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, apiszcz@lucidpixels.com Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!? In-Reply-To: <1137524502.7855.107.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Message-ID: References: <20060117012319.GA22161@linuxace.com> <1137521483.14135.59.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1137523035.7855.91.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <1137523991.7855.103.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <1137524502.7855.107.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Did you get my other e-mail? >> >> $ cp file /nfs/destination >> $ lftp> put file > > >Yes, but how big a file is this? Is it significantly larger than the >amount of cache memory on the server? As I said, if ftp is failing to >sync the file to disk, then you may be comparing apples and oranges. Ok, so what happens if you use NFS with the async option, does it go a little faster? Jan Engelhardt --