From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S932204AbWAURD1@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932204AbWAURD1 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sat, 21 Jan 2006 12:03:27 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932212AbWAURD1
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 21 Jan 2006 12:03:27 -0500
Received: from linux01.gwdg.de ([134.76.13.21]:48834 "EHLO linux01.gwdg.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932204AbWAURD0 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 21 Jan 2006 12:03:26 -0500
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:03:20 +0100 (MET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
To: Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>
cc: Michael Loftis <mloftis@wgops.com>, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>,
       dtor_core@ameritech.net, James Courtier-Dutton <James@superbug.co.uk>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
In-Reply-To: <200601211452.22017.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0601211756210.2567@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
References: <D1A7010C56BB90C4FA73E6DD@dhcp-2-206.wgops.com>
 <0FA349BF620394796EB40A3A@d216-220-25-20.dynip.modwest.com>
 <Pine.LNX.4.61.0601211017400.21704@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> <200601211452.22017.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

>
>Myself and Christian Zander were the original authors of the port to 2.6, well 
>before 2.6.0 was released. I think it's wrong to claim that the API changes 

Yes, I took the one that was/is available on http://sh.nu/nvidia/ 
and from _then_ (not early - I do not claim 2.4->2.6 portage) did my own 
stuff.


Jan Engelhardt
--