From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751215AbWAUWvq (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:51:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751216AbWAUWvq (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:51:46 -0500 Received: from linux01.gwdg.de ([134.76.13.21]:13023 "EHLO linux01.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751215AbWAUWvp (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:51:45 -0500 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:51:43 +0100 (MET) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Andrey Borzenkov cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Olaf Hering Subject: Re: cc-version not available to change EXTRA_CFLAGS In-Reply-To: <200601212207.49483.arvidjaar@mail.ru> Message-ID: References: <200601212207.49483.arvidjaar@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Which raises the question - I believed, we support Intel CC for kernel >compilation? Or was just just a dream? Not really. If ICC works though, then it's because ICC was tuned hard to behave like GCC. Jan Engelhardt --