From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751614AbWHAN4g (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2006 09:56:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751620AbWHAN4g (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2006 09:56:36 -0400 Received: from mailer.gwdg.de ([134.76.10.26]:52405 "EHLO mailer.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751614AbWHAN4f (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2006 09:56:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 15:40:37 +0200 (MEST) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Matthias Andree cc: Adrian Ulrich , nate.diller@gmail.com, dlang@digitalinsight.com, vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl, ipso@snappymail.ca, reiser@namesys.com, lkml@lpbproductions.com, jeff@garzik.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Subject: Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion] In-Reply-To: <20060801131553.GA8249@merlin.emma.line.org> Message-ID: References: <44CE7C31.5090402@gmx.de> <5c49b0ed0607311621i54f1c46fh9137f8955c9ea4be@mail.gmail.com> <5c49b0ed0607311650j4b86d0c3h853578f58db16140@mail.gmail.com> <5c49b0ed0607311705t1eb8fc6bs9a68a43059bfa91a@mail.gmail.com> <20060801010215.GA24946@merlin.emma.line.org> <20060801095141.5ec0b479.reiser4@blinkenlights.ch> <20060801090947.GA2974@merlin.emma.line.org> <20060801131553.GA8249@merlin.emma.line.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Report: Content analysis: 0.0 points, 6.0 required _SUMMARY_ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> >I didn't mean to say your particular drive were crap, but 200GB SATA >> >drives are low end, like it or not -- >> >> And you think an 18 GB SCSI disk just does it better because it's SCSI? > >18 GB SCSI disks are 1999 gear, so who cares? >Seagate didn't sell 200 GB SATA drives at that time. > >> Esp. in long sequential reads. > >You think SCSI drives aren't on par? Right, they're ahead. >98 MB/s for the fastest SCSI drives vs. 88 MB/s for Raptor 150 GB SATA >and 74 MB/s for the fastest other ATA drives. Uhuh. And how do they measure that? Did they actually ran sth like... dd_rescue /dev/hda /dev/null Jan Engelhardt --