From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750744AbVI1VJX (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:09:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750747AbVI1VJX (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:09:23 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:6320 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750744AbVI1VJX (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:09:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:09:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter To: Rohit Seth cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Mattia Dongili , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] Reset the high water marks in CPUs pcp list In-Reply-To: <1127939185.5046.17.camel@akash.sc.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <20050928105009.B29282@unix-os.sc.intel.com> <1127939185.5046.17.camel@akash.sc.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Rohit Seth wrote: > CONFIG_NUMA needs to be defined for that. And then too for flushing the > remote pages. Also, when are you flushing the local pcps. Also note > that this patch is just bringing the free pages on the pcp list closer > to what used to be the number earlier. What was the reason for the increase of those numbers?