From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932373AbWAZRzG (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:55:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751349AbWAZRzG (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:55:06 -0500 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:14026 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751347AbWAZRzE (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:55:04 -0500 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:54:47 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter To: Matthew Dobson cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sri@us.ibm.com, andrea@suse.de, pavel@suse.cz, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [patch 3/9] mempool - Make mempools NUMA aware In-Reply-To: <1138233093.27293.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <20060125161321.647368000@localhost.localdomain> <1138233093.27293.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, Matthew Dobson wrote: > plain text document attachment (critical_mempools) > Add NUMA-awareness to the mempool code. This involves several changes: I am not quite sure why you would need numa awareness in an emergency memory pool. Presumably the effectiveness of the accesses do not matter. You only want to be sure that there is some memory available right? You do not need this....