From: Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: please pull from the trivial tree
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 14:08:18 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0612011357230.7120@gockel.physik3.uni-rostock.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061201125504.GC11084@stusta.de>
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 01:41:18PM +0100, Tim Schmielau wrote:
[...]
> > would leave a comment that is correct, but less useful (I'd expect any
> > kernel hacker to know that u64 is non-atomic on many platforms).
>
>
> If kernel hackers are expected to already know it's non-atomic we could
> remove the whole comment.
>
> The comment regarding "volatile" was bogus since "volatile" wouldn't
> help against getting garbage when reading an u64 variable.
Well, it's probably too trivial to argue about anyways - I don't mind much
in either direction.
Tim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-01 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-01 11:37 please pull from the trivial tree Adrian Bunk
2006-12-01 12:41 ` Tim Schmielau
2006-12-01 12:55 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-01 13:08 ` Tim Schmielau [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-03 20:17 Adrian Bunk
2007-07-22 21:08 Adrian Bunk
2007-05-11 17:15 Adrian Bunk
2007-05-09 9:30 Adrian Bunk
2007-02-18 1:12 Adrian Bunk
2006-12-12 23:48 Adrian Bunk
2006-10-03 23:05 Adrian Bunk
2006-06-26 20:26 Adrian Bunk
2006-04-02 14:15 Adrian Bunk
2006-04-01 10:43 Adrian Bunk
2006-03-26 17:31 Adrian Bunk
2006-03-25 10:17 Adrian Bunk
2006-03-22 10:41 Adrian Bunk
2006-01-15 2:05 Adrian Bunk
2006-01-11 1:31 Adrian Bunk
2006-01-10 0:54 Adrian Bunk
2006-01-03 13:19 Adrian Bunk
2005-11-08 16:55 Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.63.0612011357230.7120@gockel.physik3.uni-rostock.de \
--to=tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).