From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750978AbWFKLNk (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 07:13:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750886AbWFKLNk (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 07:13:40 -0400 Received: from lucidpixels.com ([66.45.37.187]:56485 "EHLO lucidpixels.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750775AbWFKLNj (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 07:13:39 -0400 Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 07:13:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Justin Piszcz X-X-Sender: jpiszcz@p34.internal.lan To: Linus Torvalds cc: Jeff Garzik , Mark Lord , David Greaves , Tejun Heo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, IDE/ATA development list , albertcc@tw.ibm.com, axboe@suse.de, smartmontools-support@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.16 (previously, 2.6.15.x) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <440083B4.3030307@rtr.ca> <4400A1BF.7020109@rtr.ca> <4400B439.8050202@dgreaves.com> <4401122A.3010908@rtr.ca> <44017B4B.3030900@dgreaves.com> <4401B560.40702@rtr.ca> <4403704E.4090109@rtr.ca> <4403A84C.6010804@gmail.com> <4403CEA9.4080603@rtr.ca> <44042863.2050703@dgreaves.com> <44046CE6.60803@rtr.ca> <44046D86.7050809@pobox.com> <4405DCAF.6030500@dgreaves.com> <4405DDEA.7020309@rtr.ca> <4405E42B.9040804@dgreaves.com> <4405E83D.9000906@rtr.ca> <4405EC94.2030202@dgreaves.com> <4405FAAE.3080705@dgreaves.com> <440B6CFE.4010503@rtr.ca> <440B76B4.5080502@pobox.com> <44493023.4010109@pobox.com> <444960CC.2000009@pobox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [4597362.011000] ata3: translated ATA stat/err 0x51/04 to SCSI SK/ASC/ASCQ 0xb/00/00 [4597362.011000] ata3: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } [4597362.011000] ata3: error=0x04 { DriveStatusError } Now under 2.6.16.20. (was doing an rsync from 1 drive (IDE) -> to this SATA) drive. The SATA drive AFAIK does not have any issues, no bad sectors/etc, still the same drive as before, but this is the new one from the previous RMA. Just FYI. On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> >> Agreed, though the original poster had already done a 400GB dd from >> /dev/zero... > > Yes, but to a _file_ on the partition (ie he didn't overwrite any existign > data, just the empty parts of a filesystem). > > I realize that it's not enough for the "re-allocate on write" behaviour, > and for that you really _do_ need to re-write the whole disk to get all > the broken blocks reallocated, but my argument was just that we should > make sure to _tell_ people when they are overwriting all their old data ;) > > Linus >