From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2993182AbXCJFrI (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:47:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2993177AbXCJFrI (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:47:08 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:33404 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2993174AbXCJFrF (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:47:05 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 21:41:20 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Sergio Monteiro Basto cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mathieu_B=E9rard?= , Jeff Garzik , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Michal Jaegermann , Fabio Comolli , Tejun Heo , Janosch Machowinski , Lukas Hejtmanek , Meelis Roos , Olivier Mondoloni , Thomas Renninger , Robert Moore , lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: and try remove another quirk on this computers Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions In-Reply-To: <1173499896.21891.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <20070305015036.GH3441@stusta.de> <45EE9E39.3010800@garzik.org> <45F20541.9090208@crans.org> <1173499896.21891.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > > With this quirk I got this oops on hibernate (but computer still > working) Well, strictly speaking it's a warning, not an oops per se. What happens is that the quirk wants to do an "ioremap_nocache()", which allocates memory, and that happens very early during initialization when interrupts are disabled. And you're really not supposed to allocate memory, except using GFP_ATOMIC. But we've always been lax about that during early boot, so we have stuff that does. And resume ends up doing a lot of the same things early boot does, and shows issues like this. So the quirk is probably still a good idea, and the warning message is just that - a very scary warning message, but not an indicator that anything is seriously screwed up for you. (It is an indication of a real bug, though, even though it's harmless in practice in this case) Linus