From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761075AbXFDTwU (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:52:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758848AbXFDTwN (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:52:13 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:37954 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758049AbXFDTwN (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:52:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:52:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Ethan Solomita cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , Andrew Morton , a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl Subject: Re: [RFC 1/7] cpuset write dirty map In-Reply-To: <46646A33.6090107@google.com> Message-ID: References: <465FB6CF.4090801@google.com> <46646A33.6090107@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Ethan Solomita wrote: > > You should preserve my Signed-off-by: since I wrote most of this. Is there > > a changelog? > > > > I wasn't sure of the etiquette -- I'd thought that by saying you had > signed it off that meant you were accepting my modifications, and didn't > want to presume. But I will change it if you like. No slight intended. > > Unfortunately I don't have a changelog, and since I've since forward > ported the changes it would be hard to produce. If you want to review it > you should probably review it all, because the forward porting may have > introduced issues. I glanced over it and it looks okay. Please cc me on future submissions. What testing was done? Would you include the results of tests in your next post?