From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758697AbXK0SO4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:14:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756005AbXK0SOt (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:14:49 -0500 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:44772 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754723AbXK0SOs (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:14:48 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:14:47 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Rusty Russell cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [patch 05/14] percpu: Use a Kconfig variable to configure arch specific percpu setup In-Reply-To: <200711271530.47696.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Message-ID: References: <20071127001407.859743255@sgi.com> <20071127001430.313046247@sgi.com> <200711271530.47696.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Rusty Russell wrote: > Have you considered moving x86-64's setup_per_cpu_areas into generic code? > It's a bit messier because some archs might not have set up NUMA stuff yet, > but it's logically generic... Yes that will happen later. This is just the early cleanup work. I plan to generally bring the two x86 arches in line. The pda will be folded into the per cpu area and after that its easy to do.