From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759203AbXK0SPj (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:15:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757781AbXK0SPa (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:15:30 -0500 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:44856 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757636AbXK0SP3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:15:29 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:15:29 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: David Mosberger-Tang cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com Subject: Re: [patch 04/14] ia64: Remove the __SMALL_ADDR_AREA attribute for per cpu access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20071127001407.859743255@sgi.com> <20071127001430.083503280@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, David Mosberger-Tang wrote: > On 11/26/07, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > The model(small) attribute is not supported by gcc 4.X. The tests > > will always be negative today. > > What was the rationale for removing this attribute? The code is then similar across all architectures and can be moved into generic code.