From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759479AbXK0WCT (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:02:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758286AbXK0WCL (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:02:11 -0500 Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:51056 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757379AbXK0WCJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:02:09 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:02:08 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: David Mosberger-Tang cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com Subject: Re: [patch 04/14] ia64: Remove the __SMALL_ADDR_AREA attribute for per cpu access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20071127001407.859743255@sgi.com> <20071127001430.083503280@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, David Mosberger-Tang wrote: > Code-size reduction? You must be talking *source* code size > reduction. Surely the small-data access-method decreases object code > size. Yes source code reduction. I just added the attribute back but in such a way that any arch can add attributes to per cpu definitions.