From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754041AbXLCOx0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:53:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752839AbXLCOxT (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:53:19 -0500 Received: from sovereign.computergmbh.de ([85.214.69.204]:38850 "EHLO sovereign.computergmbh.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752784AbXLCOxT (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:53:19 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 15:53:17 +0100 (CET) From: Jan Engelhardt To: "H. Peter Anvin" cc: Arjan van de Ven , Chris Snook , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid overflows in kernel/time.c In-Reply-To: <474F8984.4010602@zytor.com> Message-ID: References: <200711300019.lAU0Jpbr003807@tazenda.hos.anvin.org> <474F6E7A.3090705@redhat.com> <474F7DC4.8000607@zytor.com> <20071129194027.10046988@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <474F8984.4010602@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Nov 29 2007 19:54, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> > >> > Anyway, I don't think compiling bc is hard on anything which has a C >> > compiler. >> >> alternative is to just also ship the precomputed values ;-) >> > > Oh, come on... it's not like bc is some obscure thing. It's a POSIX utility. People try building linux on not-so-posix systems these days...