From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754563Ab2IWV3C (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:29:02 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:59545 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754440Ab2IWV3A (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:29:00 -0400 Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:28:57 +0200 (CEST) From: Guennadi Liakhovetski X-X-Sender: lyakh@axis700.grange To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Senna Tschudin Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH 1/14] drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c: fix error return code In-Reply-To: <505F643C.3020203@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <1346945041-26676-13-git-send-email-peter.senna@gmail.com> <505F643C.3020203@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:AF+6i22CgeQh4A5LXuYRBUiwuA4ON1hDmgnvjWocdjd PEf5K5tPArs1/d/hmUOBn3DPxfj9Da1reA5egm5o5l7Hau8MJE zouZBi1wK4fspYg+bxXzjwJdrj1Zg9ExrGJbkX5UioRStNW/H9 PVOtYhy9iS4/s3CzLhieTdhUnHTuo3v+3b+Kdw2PWQ4Fa28i1b MTJDh9Qv7vQF38f3u54cN24XZJ3IszcYir++tPQnJWXUdhnmOE VE38O/9MIE8umjDwWlwHOyKR7vtwq4D7ZhU8DIW8XoTxHS46Yu 6pFU/ejfDtmBFkpI4x4oRpeexdRcZK4MjENFy10vvg0HG48JNF 85psCwsIofNQf5cuX6IAebf9SBrodvag/aGwjb5EmCl5lAA88l XIQP29KiF3LiA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mauro, Peter On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Please review. > Please review. > > Regards, > Mauro. > > -------- Mensagem original -------- > Assunto: [PATCH 1/14] drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c: fix error return code > Data: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 17:24:00 +0200 > De: Peter Senna Tschudin > Para: Mauro Carvalho Chehab > CC: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > From: Peter Senna Tschudin > > Convert a nonnegative error return code to a negative one, as returned > elsewhere in the function. > > A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as > follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) > > // > ( > if@p1 (\(ret < 0\|ret != 0\)) > { ... return ret; } > | > ret@p1 = 0 > ) > ... when != ret = e1 > when != &ret > *if(...) > { > ... when != ret = e2 > when forall > return ret; > } > > // > > Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin > > --- > drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c > index 10b57f8..a4beb6c 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c > @@ -1184,7 +1184,8 @@ static int soc_camera_probe(struct soc_camera_device *icd) > sd->grp_id = soc_camera_grp_id(icd); > v4l2_set_subdev_hostdata(sd, icd); > > - if (v4l2_ctrl_add_handler(&icd->ctrl_handler, sd->ctrl_handler)) > + ret = v4l2_ctrl_add_handler(&icd->ctrl_handler, sd->ctrl_handler); > + if (ret) > goto ectrl; Yes, this is a correct fix. I'm actually also fixing it in one of my current experimental patches, I don't think it's occurring too often in real life, so, I didn't bother sending a separate fix:-) But yes, let's fix it properly. Please, update the other patch to mx2_camera and I'll send a "fixes" pull request with these two and an ov2640 fix. Thanks Guennadi > > /* At this point client .probe() should have run already */ --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/