linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	dm-crypt@saout.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Christian Schmidt <schmidt@digadd.de>
Subject: Re: dm-crypt parallelization patches
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:32:28 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1304091624110.19672@file.rdu.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130409195259.GL6186@mtj.dyndns.org>



On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, Tejun Heo wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:42:16PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > If I drop ifdefs, it doesn't compile (because other cgroup stuff it 
> > missing).
> > 
> > So I enabled bio cgroups.
> > 
> > bio_associate_current can't be used, because by the time we allocate the 
> > outgoing write bio, we are no longer in the process that submitted the 
> > original bio.
> 
> Oh, I suppose it'd need some massaging to selectively turn off the
> cgroup part.
> 
> > Anyway, I tried to reproduce in dm-crypt what bio_associate_current does - 
> 
> and we probably need to change that to bio_associate_task().

Generally, we shouldn't associate bios with "current" task in device 
mapper targets. For example suppose that we have two stacked dm-crypt 
targets:

In the "current" process pointer in lower dm-crypt target's request 
function always points to the workqueue of the upper dm-crypt target that 
submits the bios. So if we associate the bio with "current" in the lower 
target, we are associating it with a preallocated workqueue and we already 
lost the information who submitted it.

You should associate a bio with a task when you create the bio and "md" 
and "dm" midlayers should just forward this association to lower layer 
bios.

> > in the submitting process I record "ioc" and "css" fields in "dm_crypt_io" 
> > structure and set these fields on all outgoing bios. It has no effect on 
> > performance, it is as bad as if I hadn't done it.
> 
> A good way to verify that the tagging is correct would be configuring
> io limits in block cgroup and see whether the limits are correctly
> applied when going through dm-crypt (please test with direct-io or
> reads, writeback is horribly broken, sorry).working correctly, maybe
> plugging is the overriding factor?
> 
> Thanks.

It doesn't work because device mapper on the underlying layers ignores 
bi_ioc and bi_css.

If I make device mapper forward bi_ioc and bi_css to outgoing bios, it 
improves performance (from 2:30 to 1:30), but it is still far from 
perfect.

Mikulas

---

dm: forward cgroup context

This patch makes dm forward associated cgroup context to cloned bios.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>

---
 drivers/md/dm.c |    9 +++++++++
 fs/bio.c        |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)

Index: linux-3.8.6-fast/drivers/md/dm.c
===================================================================
--- linux-3.8.6-fast.orig/drivers/md/dm.c	2013-04-09 22:00:36.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-3.8.6-fast/drivers/md/dm.c	2013-04-09 22:19:40.000000000 +0200
@@ -453,6 +453,10 @@ static void free_io(struct mapped_device
 
 static void free_tio(struct mapped_device *md, struct dm_target_io *tio)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP
+	tio->clone.bi_ioc = NULL;
+	tio->clone.bi_css = NULL;
+#endif
 	bio_put(&tio->clone);
 }
 
@@ -1124,6 +1128,11 @@ static struct dm_target_io *alloc_tio(st
 	clone = bio_alloc_bioset(GFP_NOIO, nr_iovecs, ci->md->bs);
 	tio = container_of(clone, struct dm_target_io, clone);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP
+	tio->clone.bi_ioc = ci->bio->bi_ioc;
+	tio->clone.bi_css = ci->bio->bi_css;
+#endif
+
 	tio->io = ci->io;
 	tio->ti = ti;
 	memset(&tio->info, 0, sizeof(tio->info));

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-09 20:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.1303252051520.9745@file.rdu.redhat.com>
2013-03-26 12:27 ` [dm-devel] dm-crypt performance Alasdair G Kergon
2013-03-26 20:05   ` Milan Broz
2013-03-26 20:28     ` Mike Snitzer
2013-03-26 20:58       ` Milan Broz
2013-03-28 18:53       ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 19:33         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-28 19:44           ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 20:38             ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-28 20:45               ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-09 17:51                 ` dm-crypt parallelization patches Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-09 17:57                   ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-09 18:08                     ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-09 18:10                       ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-09 18:42                         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-09 18:57                           ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-09 19:13                             ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-09 19:42                         ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-09 19:52                           ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-09 20:32                             ` Mikulas Patocka [this message]
2013-04-09 21:02                               ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-09 21:03                                 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-09 21:07                               ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-09 21:18                                 ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-10 19:24                                   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-10 23:42                                     ` [PATCH] make dm and dm-crypt forward cgroup context (was: dm-crypt parallelization patches) Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-10 23:50                                       ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-11 19:49                                         ` [PATCH v2] " Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-11 19:52                                           ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-11 20:00                                             ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-12  0:06                                               ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-12  0:22                                                 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-12  5:59                                                   ` [PATCH v2] make dm and dm-crypt forward cgroup context Milan Broz
2013-04-12 18:17                                                   ` [PATCH v2] make dm and dm-crypt forward cgroup context (was: dm-crypt parallelization patches) Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-12 18:01                                               ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-12 18:29                                                 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-15 13:02                                                   ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-16 17:24                                                     ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-16 19:41                                                       ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-18 16:47                                                       ` Mike Snitzer
2013-04-18 17:03                                                         ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-22 18:50                                                           ` Mike Snitzer
2013-05-22 19:48                                                             ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-09 18:36                   ` dm-crypt parallelization patches Vivek Goyal
2013-04-09 18:08     ` [dm-devel] dm-crypt performance Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-09 18:59       ` [dm-crypt] " Milan Broz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.1304091624110.19672@file.rdu.redhat.com \
    --to=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schmidt@digadd.de \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).