From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 22:43:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 22:43:48 -0400 Received: from hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.202.12]:36318 "HELO hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 22:43:48 -0400 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 04:50:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Adrian Bunk X-X-Sender: bunk@mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de To: John Levon , Keith Owens cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Minimum modutils version In-Reply-To: <20020930202619.GA31858@compsoc.man.ac.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, John Levon wrote: > Documentation/Changes claims modutils 2.4.2 is still acceptable. However > it seems at least 2.4.10 is needed for EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. What should > Changes be changed to ? Sounds reasonable. Keith: What's your opinion on the following patch for 2.4 (and a similar one for 2.5)? --- linux-2.4.19/Documentation/Changes.old 2002-10-26 04:44:26.000000000 +0200 +++ linux-2.4.19/Documentation/Changes 2002-10-26 04:45:06.000000000 +0200 @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ o Gnu make 3.77 # make --version o binutils 2.9.1.0.25 # ld -v o util-linux 2.10o # fdformat --version -o modutils 2.4.2 # insmod -V +o modutils 2.4.10 # insmod -V o e2fsprogs 1.25 # tune2fs o jfsutils 1.0.12 # fsck.jfs -V o reiserfsprogs 3.6.3 # reiserfsck -V 2>&1|grep reiserfsprogs > regards > john cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed