From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262334AbTEEOrB (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2003 10:47:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262298AbTEEOpj (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2003 10:45:39 -0400 Received: from inpbox.inp.nsk.su ([193.124.167.24]:5762 "EHLO inpbox.inp.nsk.su") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262334AbTEEOpe (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2003 10:45:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 21:46:44 +0700 From: "Dmitry A. Fedorov" Reply-To: D.A.Fedorov@inp.nsk.su To: Christoph Hellwig cc: Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: The disappearing sys_call_table export. In-Reply-To: <20030505144229.A23483@infradead.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 5 May 2003, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > I use the following calls: > > > > sys_mknod > > sys_chown > > sys_umask > > sys_unlink > > > > for creating/deleting /dev entries dynamically on driver > > loading/unloading. It allows me to acquire dynamic major > > number without devfs and external utility of any kind. > > And there is no risk of intersection with statically assigned major > > numbers, as it is for many others third-party sources. > > You don't want to tell me you do that for real, do you? I do that for real. Please, think about it as small portable private devfs library. > That alone is a very good idea to unexport the syscall table without > exporting those symbols.. It does not helps, I would find another way, maybe vfs_* calls or proc_mknod, unexport it too.