From: Tim Connors <tcon@Physics.usyd.edu.au>
To: Derek Glidden <dglidden@illusionary.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kapm-idled no longer idling CPU?
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 18:03:55 +1100 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.1011203175756.21427A-100000@suphys.physics.usyd.edu.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C06855F.22AD79C4@illusionary.com>
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Derek Glidden wrote:
> I posted this question about a month ago, but haven't seen a response
> since, so I'm reposting.
>
> I'm having a problem with all recent 2.4 systems that when any
> application that uses more than very minor system resources is running,
> (i.e. mozilla, netscape, xemacs, apache, Tomcat, just to name a few
> common ones I've seen this behaviour with) kapm-idled no longer receives
> scheduling time from what I can tell and I assume that means my CPU is
> never getting idled when nothing is scheduled.
I always had that problem though. Doesn't it only set kapmd-idled running
if the CPU has been idle for at least 1/3 second, though?
> I'm pretty sure this is a legit problem and not just kapm-idled
> reporting its time incorrectly since my laptop has gone from about 2-1/2
> hours of battery life in early 2.4 versions to less than 1 hour of
> battery life under the same conditions for recent kernels. Plus, if I
> exit everything until I'm just sitting at a shell prompt, I'll see
> kapm-idled start to receive time again. (Of course, the laptop isn't
> much fun when it's not running anything...)
>
> I've seen this on a number of laptops and desktop machines since about
> 2.4.9 or so.
Mmmm, my dell insp. 4000 is now running at 53 degrees (2.4.16 - mozilla
and xemacs open) - it used to run a lot cooler, even with just 2.4.13-ac4.
This is with me doing absolutely nothing.
And integrated over the uptime of the laptop, kapmd-idled seems to only be
using about 30% CPU compared to the old 50% (and 90% with an old kernel -
but that could have been that bug detected a while back)
Of course, I just remembered we have just entered summer, and this room is
damn hot - but I wouldn't expect a laptop getting so hot it needs to turn
the fan on, when doing _nothing_!
--
TimC -- http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/~tcon/
The other day I overheard that a friend of the family had called their
new kid "Noah". I thinks "Noah? I 'ardly -" and then I bursts out
laughing.. -- Screwtape in RHOD
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-03 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-29 18:58 kapm-idled no longer idling CPU? Derek Glidden
2001-11-30 11:50 ` Alan Cox
2001-11-30 12:34 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2001-11-30 13:23 ` Alan Cox
2001-11-30 15:46 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2001-12-03 7:03 ` Tim Connors [this message]
2001-11-30 12:57 Borsenkow Andrej
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.SOL.3.96.1011203175756.21427A-100000@suphys.physics.usyd.edu.au \
--to=tcon@physics.usyd.edu.au \
--cc=dglidden@illusionary.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).